Econometrica, Submission #6956, revised ON FORWARD INDUCTION
نویسندگان
چکیده
A player’s pure strategy is called relevant for an outcome of a game in extensive form with perfect recall if there exists a weakly sequential equilibrium with that outcome for which the strategy is an optimal reply at every information set it does not exclude. The outcome satisfies forward induction if it results from a weakly sequential equilibrium in which players’ beliefs assign positive probability only to relevant strategies at each information set reached by a profile of relevant strategies. We prove that if there are two players and payoffs are generic then an outcome satisfies forward induction if every game with the same reduced normal form after eliminating redundant pure strategies has a sequential equilibrium with an equivalent outcome. Thus in this case forward induction is implied by decision-theoretic criteria. This paper has two purposes. One is to provide a general definition of forward induction for games in extensive form with perfect recall. As a refinement of weakly sequential equilibrium, forward induction restricts the support of a player’s belief at an information set to others’ strategies that are optimal replies to some weakly sequential equilibrium with the same outcome, if there are any that reach that information set. The second purpose is to resolve a conjecture by Hillas and Kohlberg [27, §13.6], of which the gist is that ‘invariant backward induction outcomes satisfy forward induction.’ An outcome is invariant if every extensive form representing the same strategic situation (i.e. they have the same reduced normal form) has a sequential equilibrium with an equivalent outcome. For a game with two players and generic payoffs we prove that an invariant outcome satisfies forward induction. The definitions and theorem are entirely decision-theoretic. None of the technical devices invoked in game theory, such as perturbations of players’ strategies or payoffs, are needed. Date: December 2004. Submitted January 2007. Revised January 29, 2008.
منابع مشابه
Forward induction equilibrium
Forward induction is the notion that players in a game assume, even when confronted with an unexpected event, that their opponents chose rationally in the past and will choose rationally in the future. This paper modifies Govindan and Wilson’s (2009, Econometrica 77(1), 1-28) definition of forward induction and constructs an admissible, invariant forward induction equilibrium concept for genera...
متن کاملEvolution in Finitely Repeated Games of Common Interest Evolution in Finitely Repeated Games of Common Interest
I apply a version of Kandori, Mailath and Rob (Econometrica, 1993) and Young's (Econometrica, 1993) evolutionary dynamic to nitely repeated games of common interest. The dynamic is modi ed by allowing mutations to a ect only o path beliefs. I nd that repetition within a match leads agents to sacri ce current payo s in order to increase payo s in later stages. As a consequence, evolution leads t...
متن کاملUse of detergent system terminology and criteria for submission of manuscripts on new, or revised, analytical methods as well as descriptive information on feed analysis and/or variability
This editorial discusses development of the detergent system of feed analysis, suggests detergent system terminology for articles to be published in Animal Feed Science and Technology, provides guidelines for submission of manuscripts that describe new and revised analytical methods, including near infrared reflectance spectroscopy, and descriptive information on feed analysis and/or variabilit...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008